Effect of precipitation and temperature conditions of Central East Poland on feed value of European maize cultivars cultivated for silage
More details
Hide details
Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities ul. Konarskiego 2, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland
Final revision date: 2019-08-22
Acceptance date: 2019-09-11
Publication date: 2019-09-23
Corresponding author
Anna Płaza   

Agrotechnology, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach,, Poland
Acta Agroph. 2019, 26(2), 53-60
The study was conducted in the years 2009-2011, on a private farm. The experiment was set up in the split-plot design, in three replicates. Two experimental factors were analysed: A – time of harvest of maize green forage: I – in the stage of tasseling (75% of the plants in that stage of growth), II – in the stage of milky ripeness of the plants (after three weeks), III – in the stage of waxy ripeness of the plants (after three weeks), and B – cultivars with various lengths of the vegetation period: Pyroxenia, Codimi, Moschus, Alombo, Celive. The following parameters were determined in the collected samples of plant material: content of crude ash, digestibility of organic matter, and digestibility of dry matter. The results obtained permit the conclusion that the precipitation and temperature conditions in the years of the study caused a significant differentiation in the feed value of the green forage of the European maize cultivars. The digestibility of organic matter (OM) and the digestibility of dry matter (DM) of maize green forage were the highest if the harvest was performed in the stage of waxy ripeness of the plants in 2010, a year with the highest precipitation total. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of the harvest date, and of the selection of cultivars from the Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species (CCA), cultivated in relation to the precipitation and temperature conditions, on the feed value of green forage of maize plants.
The Authors does not declare conflict of interest
Adamczyk J., 2001. The importance of selecting varieties in the cultivation of maize for grain and silage (in Polish). Biul. Inf. IŻ-R., XXXIX, 1, 29-35.
Farre I., Faci J.M., 2006. Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agric. Water Manag., 8(3), 135-143,
Filya I., 2004. Nutritive value and aerobic stability of whole crop maize silage harvested at four stages of maturity. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 116, 141-150,
Hertmann A., Presterl T., Gedger H., 2000. Bestimmung des optimalen Erntezeitpunktes von Silomaissorten mit langsamer versus Schneller Restpflanzenabreife. Landbauforsch. Völkenrode Sonderh, 217 In: Tagungsband "Zum Futterwert von Mais" (Eds. P. Lebzien, F.J. Schwarz, J. Rath). 86-93.
Hopkins A., 2003. Potential impacts of climate change for grassland: farming industry perceptions, adaptations and mitigation options. Grass. Sci. in Eur., 8, 483-486.
Jha P.B., Ghosh J., Nirala R.B.P., 1998. Genetic variability and character association in fodder maize. J. Res. Birsa Agric. Univ., 10(2), 139-143.
Komainda M., Taube F., Klub Ch., Antje H., 2018. The effects of maize (Zea Mays L.) hybrid and harvest date on above- and belowground biomass dynamics, forage yield and quality – A trade-off for carbon inputs?. Eur. Jour. Agron., 92, 51-62,
Kowalik I., 2001. Variability and correlation of elements of the maize yield structure (Zea mays L.) depending on weather conditions and nitrogen fertilization (in Polish). Rocz. AR Poznań, Rol., 61, 77-87.
Kowalik I., Michalski T., 2009. Content of dry matter in raw material as an estimated indicator of feed value of silage of maize (in Polish). Nauk. Przyr. Tech., 3(2),1-10.
Lynch J.P., O'Kiely P., Doyle E.M., 2012. Yield, quality and ensilage characteristics of whole-crop maize and of the cob and stover components: harvest date and hybrid effect. Grass Forage Sci., 67(4), 472-487,
Magalhäes A., Rolim M., Duarte A., Pedrosa E., Silva E., 2015. Chemical attributes of soil and dry mass accumulation of maize fertilized with cassava wastewater. Engen. Agric., 35(3), 458-469,
Michalski T., Kruczyńska H., Kowalik I. 2002. Yields and quality of ensilaging maize depending on the cultivar and mowing height at harvest. Acta Sci. Pol. Agric., 1(2), 83-92.
Podkówka L., Podkówka Z., Piwczyński D., Buko M., 2015. The influence of varietal earliness on the chemical composition and digestibility of maize grain (in Polish). Rocz. Nauk Zoot., 42(2), 155-169.
Ptaszyńska G., Sulewska H., 2008. Variability of yielding of hybrids of maize of various earliness in climatic conditions of central Wielkopolska (in Polish). Acta Sci. Pol. Agric., 7(3), 93-103.
Schttenhelm S., 2008. Chemical composition and methane field of maize hybrids with contrasting maturity. Eur. Jour. Agron., 29(2-3), 72-78,
Stejskalova M., Hejcmanova P., Hejcman M., 2013. Forage value of leaf fodder of main European broad-leaved woody species. The role of grassland in a green future. Grassl. Sci. Europe., 18, 85-87.
Sulewska H., Adamczyk J., Rejek D., 2011. Evaluation of the yield of new hybrids of fodder maize (Zea Mays L.) of Smolice Breeding. Nauka Przyr. Tech., 5(1), 1-11.
Sulewska H., 2001. Yielding and nutritive value of maize harvested on green mass depending on some agrotechnical factors (in Polish). Rocz. AR Poznań. Rozp. Nauk., 315.
Swanckaert J., Pannecoucque J., Van Waes J., Cauwer B., Latre J., Haesaert G., Reheul D., 2017. Harvest date does not influence variety ranking in Belgian forage maize variety trials. Jour. Agric. Sci., 154(6), 1040-1050,
Tolera A., Berg T., Sundstolb F., 1999. The effect of variety on maize grain and crop residue yield and nutritive value of the stover. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 79(3), 165-177,
Yuxiang, Ch., Jing, Ch., Daowei Z., 2007. Effect of harvest date on shearing force of maize stems. In Liv. Sci., 111(1), 33-44,
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top